The discussion of replacing a gasoline tax with a tax on miles driven (mileage tax) is becoming more heated (even though President Obama says the Federal government isn't interested in doing it). Attached is the text of an e-mail I have sent to all of my state and federal elected representatives.
I've been reading more and more discussion about this topic - a replacement of the gasoline tax with a tax based on the number of miles driven. I am against this idea for several reasons -
1) Privacy - yet again, Big Brother will be tracking my every move. The fact of the matter is, that once the government can start to monitor how many miles I am driving, it's a small step to now gauge my speed, where I am driving to and from and transmitting this information to a central database that already contains too much information about me. I don't care to be monitored in this way. It's a slippery slope, and we are already on it with EZPass. This would push us further down that slope.
2) Cost of equipment - if all new cars will be required to have a GPS device, a counting mechanism and some sort of transmitter, who will bear the cost of the added technology? The consumer, of course. I could see this adding several hundred dollars to the price of a new car.
3) Retrofitting older vehicles - again, who pays for the cost, if this were to be required? Also, older vehicles don't necessarily have the means to handle additional devices requiring electrical power - so that could lead to additional upgrades of the vehicles systems. Meaning additional cost. And any sort of government subsidy of these items would end up costing me in the end.
I also own 2 classic cars, from the '60's and '70's. They have relatively rudimentary electrical systems, so retrofitting any sort of GPS device would be almost impossible at any sort of reasonable cost. I also value the authenticity of these cars, so any sort of modern tracking system would destroy that authenticity and impact the value of the car.
4) Infrastructure to run this thing - more government bureaucrats? And I keep thinking about the initial application of EZPass here in the Northeast - there were many many problems when this system was implemented, and even today, there are problems with phantom tickets and bad transponders.
5) This is completely counter to the move to get people to drive more fuel-efficient vehicles! An increased gas tax would certainly incent people to continue to look at vehicles that get better economy; this sort of tax doesn't drive that behavior at all. We already have too many large SUV's with only a driver on our NJ roads, although the recent spike in gas prices has certainly started a trend the other way. Eliminating the gas tax could reverse that trend.
6) This sort of tax really penalizes those who MUST drive for a living. My wife is a home health-casr nurse. As such, she drives 200+ miles each week, caring for patients that cannot leave their homes to visit a doctor or healthcare facility. This Miles-Driven Tax would impact our income and further inhibit our ability to pay for college and save for retirement, to say nothing of our day-to-day needs.
This issue is one that rates very highly with me, and I would definitely look at your stand on this issue as an indicator of whether I will vote for you come re-election time.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Sunday, February 22, 2009
GM To Kill Off Pontiac?
I saw on the NBC Nightly News that GM might be killing off Pontiac....wow.... That really struck me. They had a nice retrospective on the cars. My Dad owned three Pontiacs - a 1969 Pontiac Executive station wagon - maroon with a black interior and the third seat that faced the back. I learned to drive in this car, and the first day after I passed my driver's test (after taking it a second time!) I hit the back of a school bus and put a little ding in the front bumper.
The second one we had was a really ballsy car - a 1972 Grand Prix SJ! 400 cubic inch V8, dual exhausts, Rallye Wheels and the long hood - short deck styling. That was a fun car. Only car I ever ran out of gas. It was a lot of fun to drive - loud, ballsy and really sharp looking. I got it up to 110 mph once - but that was really scary as I think the front tires only touched the ground once every 10 feet or so!
Lastly, a 1977 Safari station wagon. Light green with 'wood' sides and a tan interior. I remember going with my Dad to pick this car up at the dealer, then taking it somewhere to get the CB radio - cool! - installed. We immediately departed for a trip to Disneyworld in it! This was one of the newly downsized GM full-sized cars.
These three cars covered about 15 years of my life. A shame that Pontiac has to be the one to go, instead of, say, Buick. OTOH, the Aztek was also a Pontiac, as was the Fiero...
The second one we had was a really ballsy car - a 1972 Grand Prix SJ! 400 cubic inch V8, dual exhausts, Rallye Wheels and the long hood - short deck styling. That was a fun car. Only car I ever ran out of gas. It was a lot of fun to drive - loud, ballsy and really sharp looking. I got it up to 110 mph once - but that was really scary as I think the front tires only touched the ground once every 10 feet or so!
Lastly, a 1977 Safari station wagon. Light green with 'wood' sides and a tan interior. I remember going with my Dad to pick this car up at the dealer, then taking it somewhere to get the CB radio - cool! - installed. We immediately departed for a trip to Disneyworld in it! This was one of the newly downsized GM full-sized cars.
These three cars covered about 15 years of my life. A shame that Pontiac has to be the one to go, instead of, say, Buick. OTOH, the Aztek was also a Pontiac, as was the Fiero...
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Some Interesting Cars
Snapped a few pictures of interesting cars I spotted in my travels this summer....
Freehold Raceway Mall - I guess if you have a Bentley, you can park however the heck you want....
On the Northway just south of Saratoga Springs, NY - Nice Aston Martin!
Spotted this Lamborghini Countach being towed on I-95 in Connecticut, near New London -
This smart car was in the library parking lot -
AJ and I took some pics of this Challenger on the Cape - very nice car but pretty big -
This cool Impreza was seen in Lake George, NY -
Freehold Raceway Mall - I guess if you have a Bentley, you can park however the heck you want....
On the Northway just south of Saratoga Springs, NY - Nice Aston Martin!
Spotted this Lamborghini Countach being towed on I-95 in Connecticut, near New London -
This smart car was in the library parking lot -
AJ and I took some pics of this Challenger on the Cape - very nice car but pretty big -
This cool Impreza was seen in Lake George, NY -
Monday, April 7, 2008
New York Auto Show - Part 3
A couple of final car comments -
1) The new Cadillac CTS is a great-looking car! They really improved it, and the new Coupe concept is really sharp - they should make it! The lines of the Coupe are so much better in person than in photos....
2) The new Jaguar XF - it's smaller than it looks in person, smaller than the XJ sedans. The styling is pretty nice - I'm not totally sure about the front end, seems a little blocky, but the rear with the sweeping roofline is really sharp and reminiscent of the XK coupe. I'm not crazy about the 'shifter' which is actually a round dial that rises out of the console when you start the car. You turn it to select Drive, Reverse, Park, etc. There are paddles behind the steering wheel to shift manually.
3) Subaru WRX STI - very cool, pumped-up version of the Impreza WRX 5-door. I like hatchbacks anyways, and the new STI is very butch-looking. The interior is dramatically improved over the previous version, and the whole car looks less 'ricey' than the previous version.
4) Mitsubishi Evolution 10 - we were very disappointed that they didn't have a car that was open. They had 2 there - the 5-speed manual and the MR with the manumatic. Hard to get a feel for the car without being able to sit in it or open the hood or trunk. A shame. But the cars looked nice. They had a Lancer GTS that was open and had a very nice interior. I still liked the STI better, I think.
So that's my overview of the show! As I noted, it was kind of an overload day but fun overall. Looking forward to next year's show already!
To view all of my pics from the show, go to -
http://s24.photobucket.com/albums/c30/ddibiase/New%20York%20Auto%20Show%202008/?start=0
1) The new Cadillac CTS is a great-looking car! They really improved it, and the new Coupe concept is really sharp - they should make it! The lines of the Coupe are so much better in person than in photos....
2) The new Jaguar XF - it's smaller than it looks in person, smaller than the XJ sedans. The styling is pretty nice - I'm not totally sure about the front end, seems a little blocky, but the rear with the sweeping roofline is really sharp and reminiscent of the XK coupe. I'm not crazy about the 'shifter' which is actually a round dial that rises out of the console when you start the car. You turn it to select Drive, Reverse, Park, etc. There are paddles behind the steering wheel to shift manually.
3) Subaru WRX STI - very cool, pumped-up version of the Impreza WRX 5-door. I like hatchbacks anyways, and the new STI is very butch-looking. The interior is dramatically improved over the previous version, and the whole car looks less 'ricey' than the previous version.
4) Mitsubishi Evolution 10 - we were very disappointed that they didn't have a car that was open. They had 2 there - the 5-speed manual and the MR with the manumatic. Hard to get a feel for the car without being able to sit in it or open the hood or trunk. A shame. But the cars looked nice. They had a Lancer GTS that was open and had a very nice interior. I still liked the STI better, I think.
So that's my overview of the show! As I noted, it was kind of an overload day but fun overall. Looking forward to next year's show already!
To view all of my pics from the show, go to -
http://s24.photobucket.com/albums/c30/ddibiase/New%20York%20Auto%20Show%202008/?start=0
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
New York Auto Show - Part 2
Ok, now on to some specific cars that I wanted to see.
1) BMW 1-Series - they had a red couple and a gold convertible, both 135i's. I like this car a lot! They also had a 2002 tii, and I can see the similarity - the 1-Series is an updated 2002 for sure, the same upright greenhouse, wide-open front end and flat tail. Too bad they couldn't do round taillights! I sat in the coupe - which had a 6-speed - for a few minutes and really liked it. It's a great size and great-looking, albeit a little heavy and probably a little too expensive.
2) Audi R8 - I have to admit to be a little disappointed - they had an R8 in white, which wasn't the most attractive look for the car. Hard to believe that they could not get a silver or black one. It's a beautiful car for sure, but the white doesn't really set the lines off that well. The also had an S5 in white, with a dark red interior, also a gorgeous car that really should have been in another color.
3) Dodge Challenger - a beautiful car - they had 3 production-appearing examples there - a couple of R/T Hemi's and a V6 base model. All were very nice, even the base version. I'd like to see a new one next to a classic Challener, just to compare the lines. But the new one is definitely retro but in a very nice way....
4) Chevy Camaro - by comparison, this was a concept car, not a production-ready version. It's also great-looking, but I am assuming that they will have to change some of the details (like raising the roof a bit) for production, so I'll withhold a judgement until then.
5) Nissan GT-R - an amazingly technologically advanced car, but pretty ugly, to be perfectly honest! It has a lot of strange curves and squared-off shapes on it, and that weird kink in the C-pillar is quite off-putting. The interior is very blocky, full of rectangular shapes. But it has a lot of 'presence' for sure, with huge wheels and tires and lots of scoops, ducts and strakes. Can't wait to hear one on the street!
6) smart fortwo - I love this car! We actually saw one on Canal Street on Thursday, the day before we went to the show. Yes, it is small, but has loads of room for 2 people inside. If I lived in an urban area and needed a car, this is what I would get. It makes a MINI look quite large. Too bad it only comes with the automanual trans.
Part 3 to come.....
-
1) BMW 1-Series - they had a red couple and a gold convertible, both 135i's. I like this car a lot! They also had a 2002 tii, and I can see the similarity - the 1-Series is an updated 2002 for sure, the same upright greenhouse, wide-open front end and flat tail. Too bad they couldn't do round taillights! I sat in the coupe - which had a 6-speed - for a few minutes and really liked it. It's a great size and great-looking, albeit a little heavy and probably a little too expensive.
2) Audi R8 - I have to admit to be a little disappointed - they had an R8 in white, which wasn't the most attractive look for the car. Hard to believe that they could not get a silver or black one. It's a beautiful car for sure, but the white doesn't really set the lines off that well. The also had an S5 in white, with a dark red interior, also a gorgeous car that really should have been in another color.
3) Dodge Challenger - a beautiful car - they had 3 production-appearing examples there - a couple of R/T Hemi's and a V6 base model. All were very nice, even the base version. I'd like to see a new one next to a classic Challener, just to compare the lines. But the new one is definitely retro but in a very nice way....
4) Chevy Camaro - by comparison, this was a concept car, not a production-ready version. It's also great-looking, but I am assuming that they will have to change some of the details (like raising the roof a bit) for production, so I'll withhold a judgement until then.
5) Nissan GT-R - an amazingly technologically advanced car, but pretty ugly, to be perfectly honest! It has a lot of strange curves and squared-off shapes on it, and that weird kink in the C-pillar is quite off-putting. The interior is very blocky, full of rectangular shapes. But it has a lot of 'presence' for sure, with huge wheels and tires and lots of scoops, ducts and strakes. Can't wait to hear one on the street!
6) smart fortwo - I love this car! We actually saw one on Canal Street on Thursday, the day before we went to the show. Yes, it is small, but has loads of room for 2 people inside. If I lived in an urban area and needed a car, this is what I would get. It makes a MINI look quite large. Too bad it only comes with the automanual trans.
Part 3 to come.....
-
Saturday, March 29, 2008
New York Auto Show - Part 1
I attended the NYIAC on Friday, Match 29 - first time in a long time that I've been to an Auto Show, and the first time to NY in decades, literally! I had forgotten how much fun it was, and also how it's a sensory overload. You really need to have a plan of attack. Ours was kind of random, following a circuitous path through the displays, which meant by the time we got to some manufacturers, like Jaguar and Volvo, where there were cars that I really wanted to see, I felt I was kind of burned out..... So, for example, I sat in the new Jaguar XF sedan, but probably couldn't appreciate it as much as I wanted to. But I'm getting ahead of myself!
Overall impressions:
1) The domestic manufacturers have a long way to go to catch up to the imports. I have to say that the domestics tend to have flashier displays - more turntables, flashing lights, models - while the imports tend to have just the cars and fewer frills. The 'door thunk-factor' of the imports is still way higher than the domestics (I was particularly disappointed with the Pontiac G8 door sound) overall, and the interiors of even the lower-priced imports are still higher-quality than more expensive domestics.
2) Chrysler products are pretty crappy. The interiors of the brand-new models like the Dodge Journey and the new minivans are really lousy - hard, cheap plastics abound and the doors are very tinny-sounding. Seats aren't any good, either. The Journey especially was disappointing, as it has a nice overall design that is ruined by cheapness in execution. I liked the forward-canted shifter and center stack, but they felt cheap. The switchgear is also low-rent.
3) Honda styling has gotten really bizarre. The Ridgeline, Pilot front-end and entire Accord are very strange-looking, and even the Civic's interior - especially the bi-level dashboard - is terrible. And now it's spreading to Acura, which had some of the nicest-looking Japanese cars previously. The 'shield' grilles are really ugly, and they have a new car that is a thinly-disguised Accord (that is make (hard to believe it) even uglier by the addition of a really bad shield grille)... I thought it said 'RL' on the trunklid but I must have been wrong, as the 2009 RL is a slightly revamped version of the current RL, not an Accord.
4) The new Challenger and Camaro are REALLY sharp. The Camaro was the concept car, but the had 3 Challengers there - 2 Hemis and a V6 version as well. It's a great looking car, even in V6 trim.
5) There were quite a few concept cars there, and I get if you lined them all up with no labeling, no one - perhaps not even the designers - could tell which one was from what company. They are all so similar, with wide-opening doors with no B pillar, bizarre captains chairs that rotate, DVD screens all over the place and floating center consoles that go all the way to the rear of the car. Oh, and ultra-practical 26-inch wheels and tires. Very disappointing, although I did like the Lincoln one.
I'll post some pictures later. But here is me in the Vette....
Overall impressions:
1) The domestic manufacturers have a long way to go to catch up to the imports. I have to say that the domestics tend to have flashier displays - more turntables, flashing lights, models - while the imports tend to have just the cars and fewer frills. The 'door thunk-factor' of the imports is still way higher than the domestics (I was particularly disappointed with the Pontiac G8 door sound) overall, and the interiors of even the lower-priced imports are still higher-quality than more expensive domestics.
2) Chrysler products are pretty crappy. The interiors of the brand-new models like the Dodge Journey and the new minivans are really lousy - hard, cheap plastics abound and the doors are very tinny-sounding. Seats aren't any good, either. The Journey especially was disappointing, as it has a nice overall design that is ruined by cheapness in execution. I liked the forward-canted shifter and center stack, but they felt cheap. The switchgear is also low-rent.
3) Honda styling has gotten really bizarre. The Ridgeline, Pilot front-end and entire Accord are very strange-looking, and even the Civic's interior - especially the bi-level dashboard - is terrible. And now it's spreading to Acura, which had some of the nicest-looking Japanese cars previously. The 'shield' grilles are really ugly, and they have a new car that is a thinly-disguised Accord (that is make (hard to believe it) even uglier by the addition of a really bad shield grille)... I thought it said 'RL' on the trunklid but I must have been wrong, as the 2009 RL is a slightly revamped version of the current RL, not an Accord.
4) The new Challenger and Camaro are REALLY sharp. The Camaro was the concept car, but the had 3 Challengers there - 2 Hemis and a V6 version as well. It's a great looking car, even in V6 trim.
5) There were quite a few concept cars there, and I get if you lined them all up with no labeling, no one - perhaps not even the designers - could tell which one was from what company. They are all so similar, with wide-opening doors with no B pillar, bizarre captains chairs that rotate, DVD screens all over the place and floating center consoles that go all the way to the rear of the car. Oh, and ultra-practical 26-inch wheels and tires. Very disappointing, although I did like the Lincoln one.
I'll post some pictures later. But here is me in the Vette....
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Casting About
I was casting about, only half-seriously, for a smaller car for my wife. She was leaving her current job, with a 20-mile daily commute, potentially for a job with an 80-mile daily commute... My Audi gets 21 mpg around town and would probably get 25 mpg in her potential new commute (mostly highway but about 10 blocks of in-city travel). The van gets 17 around town and 20 on the highway, but with the lease mileage limitation, she wouldn't have been driving that every day. With gas at just under $3 per gallon (and $3.25 for the premium the Audi requires), neither alternative was particularly compelling. So, I did some looking on-line. What I found kind of surprised me.
There aren't a lot of 'normal' sized cars out there that get high mileage any more. By 'normal' sized, I am talking about Honda Civic-sized as the minimum. Most of them seem to be in the 20 - 22 in-town/29 - 31 highway mpg ranges, which doesn't seem like much to me. I guess I was thinking with all of the advances in engine and transmission technology, lighter-weight materials and computer controls, mpg would be better. But the weights have really gone up as well. All that safety equipment - impact beams in the doors, airbags all around and in the roof and seats, ABS, stability control, brakeforce distribution, etc.
Even though it is REALLY small, I like the smart fortwo a LOT, although it's mileage is not as phenomenal as you'd think, given it's size (VERY small). Looking forward to seeing one at the New York Car Show next week. Go check it our yourself here -
http://www.smartusa.com/
And yeah, they use small letters, no caps, for the names......
The other car I like a lot is the Honda Fit - again, smaller than a 'normal' car but very utilitarian inside and kind of neat looking. Supposedly has decent performance, too. But Kathleen would probably want the automatic version, which would be boring.
Anyway, looks like it's kind of a moot point, since Kathleen has taken a job where her mileage will be reimbursed, so looks like no changes in the immediate future. Too bad, I really like the BMW 1-Series!
There aren't a lot of 'normal' sized cars out there that get high mileage any more. By 'normal' sized, I am talking about Honda Civic-sized as the minimum. Most of them seem to be in the 20 - 22 in-town/29 - 31 highway mpg ranges, which doesn't seem like much to me. I guess I was thinking with all of the advances in engine and transmission technology, lighter-weight materials and computer controls, mpg would be better. But the weights have really gone up as well. All that safety equipment - impact beams in the doors, airbags all around and in the roof and seats, ABS, stability control, brakeforce distribution, etc.
Even though it is REALLY small, I like the smart fortwo a LOT, although it's mileage is not as phenomenal as you'd think, given it's size (VERY small). Looking forward to seeing one at the New York Car Show next week. Go check it our yourself here -
http://www.smartusa.com/
And yeah, they use small letters, no caps, for the names......
The other car I like a lot is the Honda Fit - again, smaller than a 'normal' car but very utilitarian inside and kind of neat looking. Supposedly has decent performance, too. But Kathleen would probably want the automatic version, which would be boring.
Anyway, looks like it's kind of a moot point, since Kathleen has taken a job where her mileage will be reimbursed, so looks like no changes in the immediate future. Too bad, I really like the BMW 1-Series!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
